There is a sense that more and more American bloggers get in trouble with their employer for what they write on their blogs. Although there are no statistics on how many people have actually been fired for something they wrote, the stories keep coming, writes Star-Telegram:
- A reporter in Delaware was fired in February for offensive postings on his personal blog.
- Washingtonienne, - an intern on Capitol Hill - was canned when she described her sexcapades with fellow staffers.
- QueenofSky - a Delta flight attendant - was fired after she posed provocatively (she meant for it to be funny) in her uniform.
- A Microsoft employee was sacked after he posted a picture that included Macs the company had purchased.
- Heather Armstrong was fired from her web design job for writing about work and colleagues.
This once again raises an important question. Should more companies have policies that state what their employees can and cannot say on the web? This is very much the opinion of David Weinberger who writes:
»A blogging policy can make clear what employees already understand: Give away company secrets and you'll be fired. Be a whiny, complaining jerk who continually slags off your boss in public and don't count on that big Christmas bonus.«
Like Weinberger I think most blog policies are merely stating the obvious. It ought to be pretty clear to the average employee what is and isn't acceptable to post. But if companies are holding back on letting their employees blog because they fear loosing communicative control, then by all means: employ a policy!
Only problem is that if a company is that regulative about communication it probably wont be able to really harvest the fruits of employee blogging anyway.
Technorati: Blog|Business