Is credibility at all possible in a blog that stems from a company? That's one of the things I've been discussing thoroughly with Jacob over the past week. Personally I don't think that any company is credible beyond what benefits their bottom line. I'm not saying that most companies are liars here. Not unless you consider the messages of modern marketing to be lies ;-)
The only place where I see a possibility for balanced blogging about the services of a given company is in the cases where customers of the company start to blog about it. Once again I have to point to my favorite example: www.slavetotarget.com, a blog which has a lot of positive things to say about the American shopping chain but which also allows critical comments. Here's what an anonymous user wrote on the site this month:
»I cannot believe someone would have an I love Target website. This company has a horrible human rights record. My husband worked for their distribution center for 5 years, and finally quit after being treated like so much disposable garbage (sic!).«
The user then goes on to explain what's actually wrong with Target's handling of its employees. It's powerful stuff and together with the positive image of Target that is also being relayed on the web site I would say it gives you a fuller picture of Target as a company.
If the Target PR-department listens in on this blog (which would be the smart thing to do) they ought to come up with a good answer pretty damn soon! If they explain themselves in a reliable way this little exchange will secure them more credibility than any number of traditional company driven blogs.
If the market really is a conversation then companies should stop talking and start listening to what is being said.
Technorati: Media |Advertising |Weblogs